Hi,
I was confused regarding how (‘+’) and (‘-’) are defined for internal boundaries in dolfinx/multiphenicsx. In the dolfin-lagacy and multiphenics, by adding a volume measure, (‘+’)/(‘-’) represent the side with a bigger/smaller meshtag (here ). Is it still the same for the newer versions? In other words, if we have a weak form containing these signs, can we use the same weak form in dolfinx/multiphenicsx without any further consideration?
dokken
March 21, 2024, 4:54am
2
It is not. I have an example of how to get consistent orientations at
opened 08:04PM - 28 Nov 23 UTC
```python
# Computing a onesided integral over an interior facet with consisten… t orientation
# Enabled by: https://github.com/FEniCS/dolfinx/pull/2269
# Copyright 2023 Jørgen S. Dokken
# SPDX: MIT
import dolfinx
import numpy as np
import ufl
from mpi4py import MPI
mesh = dolfinx.mesh.create_unit_square(
MPI.COMM_WORLD, 10, 10, ghost_mode=dolfinx.mesh.GhostMode.shared_facet)
# Create connectivties required for defining integration entities
tdim = mesh.topology.dim
fdim = tdim - 1
mesh.topology.create_entities(fdim)
mesh.topology.create_connectivity(fdim, tdim)
mesh.topology.create_connectivity(tdim, fdim)
# Get number of cells on process
cell_map = mesh.topology.index_map(tdim)
num_cells = cell_map.size_local + cell_map.num_ghosts
# Create markers for each size of the interface
cell_values = np.ones(num_cells, dtype=np.int32)
cell_values[dolfinx.mesh.locate_entities(
mesh, tdim, lambda x: x[0] <= 0.5+1e-13)] = 2
ct = dolfinx.mesh.meshtags(mesh, tdim, np.arange(
num_cells, dtype=np.int32), cell_values)
facet_map = mesh.topology.index_map(fdim)
num_facets = facet_map.size_local + facet_map.num_ghosts
# Create facet markers
facet_values = np.ones(num_facets, dtype=np.int32)
facet_values[dolfinx.mesh.locate_entities(
mesh, fdim, lambda x: np.isclose(x[0], 0.5))] = 2
ft = dolfinx.mesh.meshtags(mesh, fdim, np.arange(
num_facets, dtype=np.int32), facet_values)
# Give a set of facets marked with a value (in this case 2), get a consistent orientation for an interior integral
facets_to_integrate = ft.find(2)
f_to_c = mesh.topology.connectivity(fdim, tdim)
c_to_f = mesh.topology.connectivity(tdim, fdim)
# Compute integration entities for a single facet of a cell.
# Each facet is represented as a tuple (cell_index, local_facet_index), where cell_index is local to process
# local_facet_index is the local indexing of a facet for a given cell
integration_entities = []
for i, facet in enumerate(facets_to_integrate):
# Only loop over facets owned by the process to avoid duplicate integration
if facet >= facet_map.size_local:
continue
# Find cells connected to facet
cells = f_to_c.links(facet)
# Get value of cells
marked_cells = ct.values[cells]
# Get the cell marked with 2
correct_cell = np.flatnonzero(marked_cells == 2)
assert len(correct_cell) == 1
# Get local index of facet
local_facets = c_to_f.links(cells[correct_cell[0]])
local_index = np.flatnonzero(local_facets == facet)
assert len(local_index) == 1
# Append integration entities
integration_entities.append(cells[correct_cell[0]])
integration_entities.append(local_index)
# Create custom integration measure for one-sided integrals
ds = ufl.Measure("ds", domain=mesh, subdomain_data=[
(8, np.asarray(integration_entities, dtype=np.int32))])
n = ufl.FacetNormal(mesh)
x = ufl.SpatialCoordinate(mesh)
# Exact integral is [y/2**2]_0^1= 1/2
L = ufl.dot(ufl.as_vector((x[1], 0)), n)*ds(8)
L_compiled = dolfinx.fem.form(L)
print(
f"Correct integral: {mesh.comm.allreduce(dolfinx.fem.assemble_scalar(L_compiled), op=MPI.SUM)}")
# Create reference implementation where we use a restricted two-sided integral with no notion of orientation
dS = ufl.Measure("dS", domain=mesh, subdomain_data=ft, subdomain_id=2)
n = ufl.FacetNormal(mesh)
x = ufl.SpatialCoordinate(mesh)
L2 = ufl.dot(ufl.as_vector((x[1], 0)), n("+"))*dS
L2_compiled = dolfinx.fem.form(L2)
print(
f"Wrong integral: {mesh.comm.allreduce(dolfinx.fem.assemble_scalar(L2_compiled), op=MPI.SUM)}")
```
Source: https://fenicsproject.discourse.group/t/wrong-facetnormal-vector-on-internal-boundaries/12887/2?u=dokken
1 Like
As always, thank you so much Jorgen! It works perfectly.
integration_entities.append(local_index)
; it should be changed to
integration_entities.append(local_index[0])
(at least for my version of dolfinx which is 0.7.3).
1 Like