```
from mpi4py import MPI
import petsc4py
from petsc4py import PETSc
# +
import numpy as np
import dolfinx
import ufl
from dolfinx import la
from dolfinx.fem import (Expression, Function, FunctionSpace, dirichletbc,
form, functionspace, locate_dofs_geometrical, Constant)
from dolfinx.fem.petsc import (apply_lifting, assemble_matrix, assemble_vector,
set_bc)
from dolfinx.io import XDMFFile
from dolfinx.mesh import (CellType, GhostMode, create_box,
locate_entities_boundary)
from ufl import dx, grad, inner, Identity, sym, tr, dot, sqrt
from math import pi
#from dolfinx import tr, dot, sqrt, sym
L, B, H = 20., 0.5, 1.
Nx = 200
Ny = int(B/L*Nx)+1
Nz = int(H/L*Nx)+1
#mesh = BoxMesh(Point(0.,0.,0.),Point(L,B,H), Nx, Ny, Nz)
mesh = create_box(MPI.COMM_WORLD, [np.array([0.0, 0.0, 0.0]),
np.array([L, B, H])], [Nx, Ny, Nz],
CellType.tetrahedron, ghost_mode=GhostMode.shared_facet)
# Material parameters and elastic constitutive relations are classical (here we take $\nu=0$) and we also introduce the material density $\rho$ for later definition of the mass matrix:
# In[2]:
E, nu = Constant(mesh,1e5), Constant(mesh,0.)
rho = Constant(mesh,1e-3)
# Lame coefficient for constitutive relation
mu = E/2./(1+nu)
lmbda = E*nu/(1+nu)/(1-2*nu)
def eps(v):
return sym(grad(v))
def sigma(v):
return 2.0*mu*eps(v) + lmbda*ufl.tr(eps(v))*Identity(mesh.topology.dim)
# Standard `FunctionSpace` is defined and boundary conditions correspond to a fully clamped support at $x=0$.
# In[3]:
V = functionspace(mesh, ("Lagrange", 1, (mesh.topology.dim, )))
u_ = ufl.TrialFunction(V)
du = ufl.TestFunction(V)
left_dofs = locate_dofs_geometrical(V, lambda x: np.isclose(x[0],0.))
bc = dirichletbc(Constant(mesh, (0.,0.,0.)), left_dofs, V)
k_form = inner(sigma(du),eps(u_))*dx
l_form = Constant(1.)*u_[0]*dx
K = PETSc.PETScMatrix()
b = PETSc.PETScVector()
assemble_system(k_form, l_form, bc, A_tensor=K, b_tensor=b)
m_form = rho*dot(du,u_)*dx
M = PETSc.PETScMatrix()
assemble(m_form, tensor=M)
# Matrices $[K]$ and $[M]$ are first defined as `PETScMatrix` and forms are assembled into it to ensure that they have the right type.
# Note that boundary conditions have been applied to the stiffness matrix using `assemble_system` so as to preserve symmetry (a dummy `l_form` and right-hand side vector have been introduced to call this function).
#
# Modal dynamic analysis consists in solving the following generalized eigenvalue problem $[K]\{U\}=\lambda[M]\{U\}$ where the eigenvalue is related to the eigenfrequency $\lambda=\omega^2$. This problem can be solved using the `SLEPcEigenSolver`.
# In[5]:
eigensolver = PETSc.SLEPcEigenSolver(K, M)
eigensolver.parameters['problem_type'] = 'gen_hermitian'
eigensolver.parameters['spectral_transform'] = 'shift-and-invert'
eigensolver.parameters['spectral_shift'] = 0.
# The problem type is specified to be a generalized eigenvalue problem with Hermitian matrices. By default, SLEPc computes the largest eigenvalues. Here we instead look for the smallest eigenvalues (they should all be real). A spectral transform is therefore performed using the keyword `shift-invert` i.e. the original problem is transformed into an equivalent problem with eigenvalues given by $\dfrac{1}{\lambda - \sigma}$ instead of $\lambda$ where $\sigma$ is the value of the spectral shift. It is therefore much easier to compute eigenvalues close to $\sigma$ i.e. close to $\sigma = 0$ in the present case. Eigenvalues are then transformed back by SLEPc to their original value $\lambda$.
#
#
# We now ask SLEPc to extract the first 6 eigenvalues by calling its solve function and extract the corresponding eigenpair (first two arguments of `get_eigenpair` correspond to the real and complex part of the eigenvalue, the last two to the real and complex part of the eigenvector).
# In[6]:
N_eig = 6 # number of eigenvalues
print("Computing {} first eigenvalues...".format(N_eig))
eigensolver.solve(N_eig)
# Exact solution computation
import scipy
from scipy.scipy.optimize import root
#from scipy.optimize import root
from math import cos, cosh
falpha = lambda x: cos(x)*cosh(x)+1
alpha = lambda n: root(falpha, (2*n+1)*pi/2.)['x'][0]
# Set up file for exporting results
file_results = XDMFFile("modal_analysis.xdmf")
file_results.parameters["flush_output"] = True
file_results.parameters["functions_share_mesh"] = True
eigenmodes = []
# Extraction
for i in range(N_eig):
# Extract eigenpair
r, c, rx, cx = eigensolver.get_eigenpair(i)
# 3D eigenfrequency
freq_3D = sqrt(r)/2/pi
# Beam eigenfrequency
if i % 2 == 0: # exact solution should correspond to weak axis bending
I_bend = H*B**3/12.
else: #exact solution should correspond to strong axis bending
I_bend = B*H**3/12.
freq_beam = alpha(i/2)**2*sqrt(float(E)*I_bend/(float(rho)*B*H*L**4))/2/pi
print("Solid FE: {:8.5f} [Hz] Beam theory: {:8.5f} [Hz]".format(freq_3D, freq_beam))
# Initialize function and assign eigenvector
eigenmode = Function(V,name="Eigenvector "+str(i))
eigenmode.vector()[:] = rx
eigenmodes.append(eigenmode)
# The beam analytical solution is obtained using the eigenfrequencies of a clamped beam in bending given by $\omega_n = \alpha_n^2\sqrt{\dfrac{EI}{\rho S L^4}}$ where :math:`S=BH` is the beam section, :math:`I` the bending inertia and $\alpha_n$ is the solution of the following nonlinear equation:
#
# \begin{equation}
# \cos(\alpha)\cosh(\alpha)+1 = 0
# \end{equation}
#
# the solution of which can be well approximated by $(2n+1)\pi/2$ for $n\geq 3$.
#
# Since the beam possesses two bending axis, each solution to the previous equation is
# associated with two frequencies, one with bending along the weak axis ($I=I_{\text{weak}} = HB^3/12$)
# and the other along the strong axis ($I=I_{\text{strong}} = BH^3/12$). Since $I_{\text{strong}} = 4I_{\text{weak}}$ for the considered numerical values, the strong axis bending frequency will be twice that corresponding to bending along the weak axis. The solution $\alpha_n$ are computed using the
# `scipy.optimize.root` function with initial guess given by $(2n+1)\pi/2$.
#
# With `Nx=400`, we obtain the following comparison between the FE eigenfrequencies and the beam theory eigenfrequencies :
#
#
# | Mode | Solid FE [Hz] | Beam theory [Hz] |
# | --- | ------ | ------- |
# | 1 | 2.04991 | 2.01925|
# | 2 | 4.04854 | 4.03850|
# | 3 | 12.81504 | 12.65443|
# | 4 | 25.12717 | 25.30886|
# | 5 | 35.74168 | 35.43277|
# | 6 | 66.94816 | 70.86554|
#
# ## Modal participation factors
#
# In this section we show how to compute modal participation factors for a lateral displacement in the $Y$ direction. Modal participation factors are defined as:
#
# \begin{equation}
# q_i = \{\xi_i\}[M]\{U\}
# \end{equation}
#
# where $\{\xi_i\}$ is the i-th eigenmode and $\{U\}$ is a vector of unit displacement in the considered direction. The corresponding effective mass is given by:
#
# \begin{equation}
# m_{\text{eff},i} = \left(\dfrac{\{\xi_i\}[M]\{U\}}{\{\xi_i\}[M]\{\xi_i\}}\right)^2 = \left(\dfrac{q_i}{m_i}\right)^2
# \end{equation}
#
# where $m_i$ is the modal mass which is in general equal to 1 for eigensolvers which adopt the mass matrix normalization convention.
#
# With `FEniCS`, the modal participation factor can be easily computed by taking the `action` of the mass form with both the mode and a unit displacement function. Let us now print the corresponding effective mass of the 6 first modes.
# In[8]:
u = Function(V, name="Unit displacement")
u.interpolate(Constant((0, 1, 0)))
combined_mass = 0
for i, xi in enumerate(eigenmodes):
qi = assemble(ufl.action(ufl.action(m_form, u), xi))
mi = assemble(ufl.action(ufl.action(m_form, xi), xi))
meff_i = (qi / mi) ** 2
total_mass = assemble(rho * dx(domain=mesh))
print("-" * 50)
print("Mode {}:".format(i + 1))
print(" Modal participation factor: {:.2e}".format(qi))
print(" Modal mass: {:.4f}".format(mi))
print(" Effective mass: {:.2e}".format(meff_i))
print(" Relative contribution: {:.2f} %".format(100 * meff_i / total_mass))
combined_mass += meff_i
print(
"\nTotal relative mass of the first {} modes: {:.2f} %".format(
N_eig, 100 * combined_mass / total_mass
)
)
# We see that the first, third and fifth mode are those having the larger participation which is consistent with the fact that they correspond to horizontal vibrations of the beam.
# In[ ]:
```

I was able to get scipy.scipy.optimize by compiling scipy dev release from source and installing with pip. So far assemble_system and assemble seem to be deprecated. If I remember I think I have a reference to assemble in one of my posts as it relates to a stiffness matrix. Also I dug out:

which points to tutorial however yet I don’t really know which part would relate to any equivalency to assemble in dolfinx0.7…

So far I am requesting a little bit more information about what is being assembled and/or assembled for a system if there where a place in a textbook for example that might be able to walk me through it what in terms of math formula assemble and assemble_system or supposed to do?

So far assemble and assemble_system are no longer functions in dolfix0.7 so what I am requesting information or help about that how to get the example to start working the same way that it used to…

So far I have:

as relates to a LocalAssembler currently I am looking that over if LocalAssembler relates to assembler as shown in the 3D Modal example posted above…